JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 5, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant William Alirio Rosas Martinez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica contra el auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia, aporque el término establecido en el auto de inadmisión, en el cual se ordenaba corregirla, venció en silencio.

Se CONFIRMA el auto recurrido, por un lado, porque en el recurso impetrado no se controvirtieron las razones que justificaron la decisión de rechazo y, por el otro, porque el actor pretende utilizar el recurso con miras a revivir el término que dejó vencer para subsanar la demanda.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de esta Corporacion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto del seis (6) de octubre de 2014, proferido por el Magistrado Sustanciador Mauricio Gonzalez Cuervo, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda interpuesta por el ciudadano William Alirio Rosas Martinez.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.